HIV, Cancer Research and Deception: A Case Manager Takes a Trip Through Wonderland

Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism will become psychologically impossible. – Bertrand RussellPDF: The Impact of Science on Society

_________________

There is no denying that shortly after the disco era, the party came to an end for many.  I had been dancing away my teens for a few years when the headlines about a “gay cancer” broke, in 1981. Shortly after, I started seeing, “Gay Related Immune Deficiency” (GRID). Today these terms are “known” as “HIV” and “AIDS“. No matter the name given, one thing was clear to me from early on: It was terrifying, terminal and just waiting to get me at the slightest indiscretion. After going through my 20s, I remember feeling glad that I had been too young to be out at clubs while people were getting infected, but later I questioned this logic, as it did not seem that I had done things much differently than my peers.

Donna Summer and Disco - 1979: The end of the innocence?
Donna Summer and Disco – 1979: The end of the innocence?

Despite years of being a part of the gay community and romping through my 20s and 30s just as randy as the next guy, I remain negative. Aside from the pain of losing a very dear friend, HIV remained largely on the periphery for me.  In regard to HIV, the only thing I seemed to share with my brothers was biting my nails, waiting for test results.  To my surprise, I learned of men who tried to get infected, on purpose. I felt alone in my own community until I realized that I was not alone:

IN THE SHADOW OF THE EPIDEMIC: BEING HIV-NEGATIVE IN THE AGE OF AIDS

By Walt Odets

Survival Guilt in HIV-Negative Men

In_the_Shadow_large

Whether due to survival guilt, or simply a sense of duty, I volunteered for agencies during my undergraduate years, providing emotional support to their clients. After graduate school,  I decided to work as a case manager for low-income individuals living with HIV.  Like many others, I grew up believing  that once diagnosed with HIV, it was only a matter of time before treatment was required and that strict adherence to medication was essential, eventually.  Inevitably.

It was not long after I started that I noticed I was not working with many gay men: most of my clients were either straight men, or women. The one thing most of them had in common was a history of IV drug use. While I will not cover the topic in this blog, I noted also that most of the IV drug users had a history of childhood sexual abuse.

Several years in to the position, I traveled with a friend from a sister agency, to see a client at UCSF. During the trip we had a conversation about how odd it was that two gay men, both negative for HIV, were running around looking after bikers from the East Bay. It was a beautiful day in the city and during the drive back up north to the country, I allowed the conversation to escape my mind. However, once I was back on the road home, I relived the conversation and asked myself just how was it that what once was known as a gay disease was not?

I cannot think of anybody I know who is taking medication for HIV that does not believe they are taking poison – the equivalent of chemotherapy, on a daily basis. Some have rituals to heal the medicine and bless it, others require specific combinations of food, and some just slam them down. Even so, without exception, all tell me they feel better when they are not taking them.

maxresdefault

Enter “Down The Rabbit Hole”, with Popeye (Federal Jack). More than once he has had Steve Stars as a guest. While the topics he covers with Steve are diverse, it was through his show that I learned of Steve and the video, “HIV=AIDS: Fact or Fraud?”:

One of the most powerful video documentaries of our time boldly reveals the modern medical-industrial complex’s dire descent into utter corruption. HIV/AID$ – A deadly and dangerous DECEPTION! This feature-length expose explains exactly how the 300-Billion-dollar AID$ fraud began, why HIV can NOT be the cause of AIDS, what the real causes could be, and who manipulates the public’s good intentions while poisoning hundreds of thousands with toxic drugs that cause the very disease they are supposed to prevent. This is a systematic dissection of the HIV/AID$ machine and how they hijacked a program designed to fight a worldwide plight of human suffering and drove it down the road to hell. Yet this program offers hope, inspired by the courage and articulate arguments of a group of growing voices internationally challenging the HIV=AIDS=DEATH hysteria. A MUST SEE for anyone interested in truly understanding the facts about HIV/AID$. You will meet a number of highly reputable scientists who all agree that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS, including Dr. Peter Duesberg, who was the first scientist to map the genetic structure of retroviruses. He is joined by Dr Charles Thomas, Nobel Prize winner Dr. Kary Mullis along with Dr. David Rasnick, an expert in the field of protease inhibitors. Is HIV/AIDS the golden idol of junk science? Judge for yourself. Professionally produced, written and researched, acclaimed by physicians, scientists, journalists and humanitarians internationally, this is the video encyclopedia of HIV/AIDS dissident movement!  Link

Following the video is an outline of the main talking points, along with some links . I encourage readers to watch the video, as well as listen to Steve Stars via Down the The Rabbit Hole:

Steve Stars and the HIV/AIDS Fraud: 4-4-2012:

In the second hour of Down the Rabbit Hole with Popeye:

Take note of the origins of the CDC and the military-industrial complex in the interviews, here

Look in to people who have worked on cancer research.  Judith Vary Baker is a good resource, as working on a cure for cancer was her passion. Had history not been altered, things may have been quite different: Search

Also:

Dr. Mary’s Monkey How the Unsolved Murder of a Doctor, a Secret Laboratory in New Orleans and Cancer-Causing Monkey Viruses are Linked to Lee Harvey Oswald, the JFK Assassination and Emerging Global Epidemics

Evidence of top-secret medical experiments and coverups of clinical blunders

The 1964 murder of a nationally known cancer researcher sets the stage for this gripping exposé of medical professionals enmeshed in covert government operations over the course of three decades. Following a trail of police records, FBI files, cancer statistics, and medical journals, this revealing book presents evidence of a web of medical secret-keeping that began with the handling of evidence in the JFK assassination and continued apace, sweeping doctors into coverups of cancer outbreaks, contaminated polio vaccine, the arrival of the AIDS virus, and biological weapon research using infected monkeys. Link

The AIDS fraud video begins with questions: If HIV is not the cause of AIDS, why would the real cause be hidden? If HIV is not the cause of AIDS, then what is?

For years, Robert Gallo had been seeking to prove that a retrovirus was the cause of cancer. However, as noted by Luc Montagnier, (who discovered the virus six months prior to Gallo’s announcement), it was a bit suspicious that after years of failure, Gallo was quick to attribute HTLV-III to the cause of AIDS. Gallo’s ethics were called in to question, as he made announcements prior to a peer review of his work. Seemingly overnight, a virus that had been studied for years as a possible cause to cancer was linked to HIV. Montagnier’s efforts to have further research in to the validity of HIV as the cause of AIDS were rejected:

RETHINKING AIDS

Rethinking AIDS (RA) is a voluntary, open-membership association of people who have signed the petition agreeing that “It is widely believed by the general public that a retrovirus called HIV causes the group diseases called AIDS. Many biochemical scientists now question this hypothesis. We propose that a thorough reappraisal of the existing evidence for and against this hypothesis be conducted by a suitable independent group. We further propose that critical epidemiological studies be devised and undertaken.”RA seeks to bring critical reappraisal to all the facts and generalizations that have been misinterpreted under HIV/AIDS theory and to make the media and the general public aware of the pressing need for such reappraisal, including the corrosive impact of this theory on scientific research and on the human and legal rights of people who test positive on an “HIV test.”RA welcomes all who share this aim. In lieu of membership dues, members are urged to consider making a contribution in support of RA’s work (tax-deductible in the United States). A formal description of RA’s aims, organization and governance can be found in the Bylaws.HIV/AIDS theory has generated an enormous mass of technical publications and official reports, but research has failed to provide definitive answers to a host of questions, for instance…

The AIDS industry was born. Follow the money (or monkey). See also: Peter Duesberg

From the video: Ten scientific reasons why HIV does not cause AIDS:

1. If HIV caused AIDS, it would be the first virus in history that killed someone after the body developed anti-bodies

2. Despite what we are told, HIV does not kill the T-cells it infects

3. HIV does not infect enough T-cells to cause AIDS

4. HIV has no AIDS-causing gene and it is quite similar to all other retroviruses

  •  Humans are “infected” with an average of 50-100 retroviruses. If none of these cause AIDS, why should HIV?
  •  Or, if HIV causes AIDS, why not all of the rest?

5. There is no such thing as a slow virus

6. HIV is not a new virus, so it could not cause a new epidemic (Farr’s Law):

“The curve of cases of an epidemic rises rapidly at first, then climbs slowly to a peak from which the fall is steeper than the previous rise.”

  • Farr’s law in this case: HIV has been infecting people for centuries, without causing AIDS

7. HIV fails Koch’s Postulates

8. AIDS has remained in its original risk groups

  • While HIV infections are 50/50 with males and females, males make up over 90% of AIDS cases (drug use?)

9. The international profile of AIDS patients is inconsistent (at about 40 minutes in to the video, here).

  • AIDS develops more rapidly in the Unites States than in Africa
  • In Africa, AIDS is distributed equally amongst males and females – is it even the same disease?
  • If thousands in Africa were dying, where are the graves? (they do not cremate)
  • Enter the World Health Organization and funding for diarrhea

10. AIDS occurs without HIV infection and most people who have HIV never develop AIDS

  • Why do different groups develop different symptoms from AIDS?
  • Hemophiliacs vs. Gay men (gay men used nitrite inhalers, for example)
  • If someone has AIDS-related infections, but does not test positive for HIV, they are not counted/disease attributed to other causes

So, what does cause AIDS, or what factors may be involved in maintaining the HIV hypothesis? Or, the fox watching the hen house:

  • Correlation with rise in drug use and AIDS (not HIV)
  • Drugs suppress the immune system, along with lack of rest from partying
  • Review stats for women and IV drug use (55 minutes)
  • Incidence of Kaposi’s Sarcoma correlated with use of poppers
  • Anus not as thick as vagina (i.e. direct line to bloodstream combined with fecal matter/pathogens entering the bloodstream)
  • Even if a condom breaks, the receiver is still exposed to chemicals in the condoms, due to tearing – direct to bloodstream
  • The more blood a person receives via transfusion, the more likely they are to die, yet life expectancy of hemophiliacs has risen, regardless of HIV infection (Is it foreign proteins introduced during transfusion,  or HIV?)
  • Diagnosis of HIV leads people to be terrorized and take medications. Note: In 1987, when AZT (chemotherapy) was approved for use in people living with HIV, it was considered too dangerous to use on cancer patients, it damages body tissues/DNA and is linked to being a possible cause of cancer, itself
  • People are treated with drugs, even if they are not sick, including babies (retroactive abortion?)
  • Parents are threatened with loss of children if they do not adhere to medication regimen
  • New drugs announced during press conferences, without peer review
  • Even though studies indicate small amounts of protease inhibitors are all that it takes to kill HIV, patients are prescribed huge doses of medication over long periods of time
  • Excuse given for drug failure is mutation of the virus, but studies do not back this up
  • AIDS industry relies on HIV hypothesis and HIV researchers rely on drugs to produce AIDS
  • At one hour and twenty minutes: Politics and how people can be manipulated with an epidemic
  • Inaccuracy of HIV tests
  • Exaggeration by corporate media
  • Hegelian Dialectic (Problem, reaction, solution): Convince people that there is a problem and they will beg for a solution
  • Gay men wanted to distance themselves from a connection between lifestyle/behavior and HIV (more related to drug use than sex)
  • As such, HIV was changed from a drug problem to a medical problem
  • Follow the money from here: Are drug makers really out for gay rights, or are they just trying to create more patients?
  • Pharmaceutical companies funded both sides with disinformation: liberal and conservative
  • Speaking out against the HIV hypothesis can result in being ostracized from the gay community, or end a career
  • Anybody who questions the disproportionate funding for AIDS research in relation to other diseases are portrayed as being anti-gay
  • The CDC continues to add diseases to the list that they attribute to HIV, in order to keep fear levels high in the entire population
  • Proponents state that the reason that there are not so many dying in Africa is because it is a different strain of HIV
  • Viral load hypothesis – tests do not measure if the discovered virus is alive or dead
  • The endowment of HIV with supernatural powers/special properties

The video concludes with a list of diseases throughout history that have been attributed to being caused by germs, but were not (e.g., scurvy, pellegra [malnutrition], SMON [result of taking a drug]), as well as the role of the media. As noted, the media were quick to reject handouts from politicians, but eagerly accepted anything from the National Institutes of Health – hook, line and sinker, without ever questioning anything, or thinking to do so. In other words, people relied solely on the powers that be for their information.

As with any type of propaganda, Hollywood was quick to jump on board and churned out heart-wrenching films, based on the HIV hypothesis and the the necessity of taking medications.

I was not surprised to learn that Bill Gates was  involved in funding from the early days. Gates is on record with discussing population reduction (Eugenics) and he is a member of the shadow government known as the Council on Foreign Relations:

While it would be nice to see an update of the video in hopes that by addressing recent developments people may take it more seriously, the history of HIV is what it is. No matter what the case, it is clear that the HIV hypothesis is flawed, at best. I am well aware of United Nations’ Agenda 21 and the global eugenics movement. Major corporations run the world, so it is not much of a leap to realize that they do not care about anybody.

While questions remain, I leave the reader at this point to digest what has been put forward; the reality that our government not only does not care if we die, but actively attempts to kill us, is a hard pill to swallow.

Fore more information:

Deconstructing “AIDS”
The Advanced Iatrogenic Disease Syndrome

healbigaids fraud screen

Advertisements